Wikipedia: Beneath the Surface

Articles

Wikipedia: Beneath the Surface


Wikipedia has quickly become
the world’s largest encyclopedia and one of the most visited websites. But how does information get into
Wikipedia in the first place? There’s a lot to discover when
you scratch beneath the surface. Wikipedia is a wiki, a special kind of website that allows many people to
contribute to the content. The word wiki means “quick” in Hawaiian. The name comes from the fact that on the
most basic level a wiki is a quick way to make a web page. Wikis help people collaborate online. This means that a group of people
can contribute information to a wiki without seeing each other face to face. Although Wikipedia is the most
well-known and ambitious wiki, there are plenty of other specialized wikis
that exist for collaborative research and just about anything else you can imagine. Many wikis are limited to specific groups of
people, but Wikipedia allows anyone in the world to create an account, sign in, and then
contribute to the information on a topic. That includes you. A Wikipedia page is set up with
several sections: the Article, Discussion, Edit, and History tabs. The information you read in
Wikipedia is on the “Article” tab. This is where the voices of many
different volunteer authors merge together into an overview of the subject
that anyone in the world can read. On a Wikipedia page – like this page on
Gun Politics – the authors work together to present background information on the topic. A good page will also include references to
other information sources so readers know where the knowledge is coming from. These references point people to
information that’s been published in books, newspapers,journals,and on websites. Wikipedia has some key guidelines
to help the volunteer authors. The first is “No Original Research.” Unlike books and journal articles where
researchers publish their original ideas, experiments, and theories, Wikipedia
provides background information gathered from information sources published elsewhere. Additionally, Wikipedia’s guidelines emphasize that all content should present
a “Neutral Point of View.” This is always a challenge, especially
for controversial topics and many pages in Wikipedia have warning messages
indicating that the content is biased. One of the most important aspects of Wikipedia
is that the content can evolve over time. When there are many different authors
creating, updating, and deleting content, the information might be in flux. But one benefit of the shifting nature
of Wikipedia is that people from all over the world can contribute to what
is known and understood about a topic. In fact information can be developed
in Wikipedia more quickly for an event as it is happening than newspapers
can publish it. At the same time, since Wikipedia’s content can
be in flux, authors might change the information to reflect their personal
views and introduce bias. As a result, it can be challenging
to keep a neutral point of view when many people are offering
their ideas to the content. It’s clear that authors will
bring their opinions to a Wikipedia page whether
they intend to or not. In the Discussion tab of a Wikipedia page you
will often find lively debate about the content. Authors leave notes for each other about
the changes they’ve made to the content and they debate about how the
information should be presented. This is where you do see
individual voices and, many times, they’ve got definite opinions to share. So unlike the main article page, the
Discussion page is the for personal opinion. By looking through the Discussion,
you can sometimes learn just as much about the sensitive areas of a topic as
you could by checking the main content. In the History tab, you can see every
change that’s been made to a Wikipedia page and some indication of who made it. Sometimes it’s a user name. At other times you just see the IP
address of the person’s computer. But who are they? There are more than 75,000
active contributors to Wikipedia and the number is growing all the time. Additionally, Wikipedia has a few
administrators who have higher editing powers. These administrators can delete pages if
the topic isn’t considered important enough. They can also flag pages with notes
about the quality of the content. One of the controversial aspects of Wikipedia
is that it’s impossible to tell anything about the authors, including their
level of expertise on a topic. Someone might be the world’s
leading expert on a topic or they might be your next-door
neighbor who just has a strong opinion. Wikipedia challenges the way some people define
“expert” and it equalizes the opportunity for all people to share what they know. For some people loosening up the concept
of who’s an “expert” is a good thing. For others, it’s a threat to the
accuracy and validity of information. The fact that Wikipedia authors are anonymous
makes the content different from books, journals, magazines, and newspapers. In these publications the author’s
name is on the line in terms of the quality and the accuracy of their work. These sources have gone through
formal editing and peer review process to assure the quality and
accuracy of the information. Wikipedia doesn’t have this same
kind of formal review process. Instead, it relies on anonymous authors to keep
each other in check so the content is presented in a fair, neutral, and balanced way. Sometimes it succeeds and sometimes it fails. But how accurate is Wikipedia? Well, in 2006 the journalNature, an important
science research journal, conducted a study. It showed that theEncyclopaedia
Britannica
is only slightly more reliable than Wikipedia when it comes to science topics. When expert scientists reviewed
fifty different topics, Wikipedia averaged about four errors per entry.Britannicaaveraged three. But at the same time, other critics point out that Wikipedia pages often
point to insufficient references. And Wikipedia itself cautions users
that Wikipedia articles aren’t complete when they’re first started, and they may
contain false or debatable information. In fact, some pages start out pretty biased
before the volunteer authors can work towards consensus and a neutral point of view. So keep in mind that Wikipedia is
an evolving information resource. The information shifts and changes. Beneath the surface is a thriving
community of people who work together to make information available
on a topic, but it’s impossible to determine if they are experts. Wikipedia is a jumping off point
into other sources – like books, articles, newspaper articles and websites. Use it for background information,
but dig deeper…and search wider too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *